“Find any contradictions within the RFQ documents”
Every clause captured. Every conflict on the table.
Reviews entire RFQ, finds if there are any contradictions between SoW, Site specs, and engineering diagrams, drafts and RFI to send and loads it in your email
Why teams hand it over
Obligations hide across the SoW, the specs and the drawings. Miss one and you've mispriced the job. Miss a contradiction and you've absorbed a variation you could have claimed.
Capable where it counts. Careful where it matters.
- Reads the SoW plus every spec and drawing it references.
- Builds a cited, clause-by-clause checklist, trimmed to a usable depth, not a photocopy.
- Splits it per equipment package, ready for suppliers.
- Flags every SoW-vs-spec discrepancy into a conflict register.
- Drafts supplier RFQ emails, drafts only, nothing sent without you.
A simulated run, on synthetic documents.
Made-up companies and numbers. The workflow is the real one.
A SoW read clause by clause, into checklists you can defend.
What you get back
- 01Master compliance checklist, clause by clause with sources
- 02Per-package supplier checklists
- 03Conflict & variation register
- 04Supplier RFQ email drafts
- 05A one-page project brief
Common questions about this task
How is this different from reading the SoW carefully?
It is reading carefully (every clause, spec and drawing) but it doesn't tire on page 140, and every row records its source so any reviewer can verify it in seconds.
What happens with the conflicts it finds?
Each goes into a register with both citations side by side. Your commercial team decides what's a clarification and what's a variation.
Can we send the output straight to suppliers?
Yes. Package checklists carry only that package's scope, and outputs are screened so internal notes stay internal.
Send a real tender. Get the output back.
Hand Elora Grid one real task and judge the result yourself.